Class IX
Chapter – 3
Poverty as a Challenge
Question-Answers Part -3
Ques.1. Describe how the poverty line is estimated in India.
Ans :
In India, poverty line is measured considering the following factors required
for subsistence:
1. Minimum level of food requirement 2. Clothing 3. Footwear
1. Minimum level of food requirement 2. Clothing 3. Footwear
4. Fuel and Light 5.
Education 6. Medical requirement etc.
These physical quantities are multiplied by their prices. The
present formula for food requirement is based on the desired calorie
requirement. On the basis of these calculations in 1999 - 2000, the poverty
line in the rural areas was fixed Rs.328 per capita per month and in urban
areas, it was Rs.454. People earning more than this amount were considered
above poverty line and earning less than this amount were considered as living
below poverty line. The minimum amount in urban area is higher than that in
rural area because of higher price levels in urban areas. The minimum food
requirement is measured in calories which is 2100 per person per day in urban
areas and 2400 in rural areas. The minimum calorie requirement in rural area in
higher as rural people are engaged in more physical work.
Ques.2. Do you think that present methodology of poverty
estimation is appropriate?
Ans. The present methodology of poverty estimation does not look
appropriate. It only takes one factor in view and that is the economic factor.
Moreover it considers about a “minimum” subsistence level of living rather than
a “reasonable” level of living.
Poverty has many dimensions. With development, the definitions
of what constitutes poverty also changes. Its concept now has broadened to
human poverty.
If poverty is to be removed in real sense and the people are to
be brought above the poverty line, not only we need to increase their income
but also, we have to provide the people with job-security, equality, social
status, respect and dignity.
Ques.3. Describe poverty trends in India since 1973.
Ans : (i) As per the data, there is a substantial decline
in poverty ratio in India from 55 percent in 1973 to 36 percent in 1993. There
was further decline from 36 percent in 1993 to 26 percent in 2000.
(ii) Although the number of poor people remained stable (about 320
million) in the earlier two decades (1973 to 1993), there was significant
reduction in the number of poors to about 260 million till 2000.
(iii) Poverty ratio always remained higher in rural areas compared to
urban areas.
(iv) If the present trend continues, the people below poverty line
may come down to less than 20 percent in the next few years.
Ques.4. Give an account of interstate disparities in poverty in
India.
Ans : The proportion of poor is not the same in every state.
Though there has been a decline in poverty in every state from the early
seventies, the success rate of reducing poverty has varied from state to state.
In 20 states and union territories, the poverty ratio is less than the national
average of 26. In others, the poverty ratios are higher than the national
average. Among these, Orrisa and Bihar continue to be the two poorest states
with poverty ratios of 47 and 43 per cent respectively. Both rural and urban
poverty are quite high in these states, and also in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar
Pradesh.
On the other hand, states like Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh,
Gujarat, Kerala, Punjab, Haryana and Jammu and Kashmir and West Bengal have
shown a significant decline in poverty. Improved Public distribution of food
grains in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, focus on human resource development in
Kerala, high agricultural development in Punjab & Haryana and land reform
measures adopted in West Bengal are some of the factors responsible for the
decline in poverty in these states.
Ques.5. Describe global poverty trends.
Ans : The proportion of people in developing countries living on
less than $1 per day has fallen from 28 per cent in 1990 to 21 per cent in
2001. There has been a substantial reduction in global poverty since the
nineteen eighties. However, the reduction in poverty is marked with great
regional differences. Due to rapid economic growth and massive investment in
human resource development, poverty declined substantially in China and
Southeast Asian countries.
On the other hand, in South Asian countries (India, Pakistan,
Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan), the decline has not been as rapid. While
the ratio of poverty in Latin America has remained the same, in sub-Saharan
Africa, poverty has risen from 41 per cent in 1981 to 46 per cent in 2001.
According to the world development report of 2001, countries like Nigeria,
Bangladesh and India still have a large percentage of people living under
poverty. Poverty has also resurfaced in some of the former socialist countries
like Russia, where officially it was non-existent earlier.
Ques.6. Discuss the major reasons for poverty in India.
Ans : The major reasons for poverty in India are:
a)
Colonial Rule: India
went through a long phase of low economic development under the British
colonial administration. The policies of the colonial government ruined
traditional handicrafts and discouraged development of industries like
textiles.
b)
High growth in Population: The
rapid growth of population, particularly among the poor, is considered one of
the major causes behind Indian poverty. Poor people are illiterate and have
traditional outlook. Hence, they are either ignorant of birth control measures
or not convinced of the need of birth control. Moreover, they consider male
child as an asset, that is, as a source of income and a source of security
during old age.
c)
Low Rate of Economic
Development: The actual rate of growth in India has always been below the
required level. It has been around 4 per cent since 1951. This has resulted in
less job opportunities. This was accompanied by a high growth rate of
population.
d)
Unemployment:
Another important factor that can be held responsible for the incidence of high
poverty in India is the high degree of unemployment and underemployment. The
job seekers are increasing at a higher rate than the increase in the employment
opportunities.
e)
Unequal Distribution:
Although national income of India has been increasing since 1951, it was not
properly distributed among different sections of the society. A large
proportion of increased income has been pocketed by a few rich. They become
richer. Consequently, the majority of people have to live below the poverty
line.
f)
Social Factors:
Various social factors, viz., caste system, joint family system, religious
faiths, law of inheritance, etc., have blocked the path of economic
development.
Ques.7. Describe current government strategy of poverty
alleviation.
Ans : Removal of poverty has one of the major objectives of
Indian developmental strategy.
The current government strategy of poverty alleviation is based
on two planks:
(1) Promotion of Economic Growth
(2) Targeted Anti-poverty Programmes
Some of the anti-poverty programmes undertaken by government at
present are discussed below:
a)
Prime Minister’s Rozgar Yojana (PMRY):
Started in 1993, this programme aims to create self-employment opportunities
for educated unemployed youth in rural areas and small towns.
b)
Pradhan Mantri Gramodaya Yojana (PMGY):
Launched in 2000, this aims to create and improve basic services like primary
health, primary education, rural shelter, rural drinking water and rural
electrification.
c)
National Food for Work programme (NFWP):
Launched in 2004 in 150 most backward districts of the country, this programme
is open to all rural poor who are in need of wage employment and desired to do
manual unskilled work.
No comments:
Post a Comment